Computer-based classification of visual field data
EVERYTHING WHICH IS PRESENTED ON THIS PAGE HAS ALREADY BEEN PUBLISHED IN SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS UNDER MY AUTHOR- OR CO-AUTHORSHIP! THEREFORE, COPYING OF THE ENTIRE PAGE OR PARTS OF IT IS ONLY PERMITTED WITH REFERENCE TO MY HOMEPAGE AND THE CORRESPONDING SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS, RESPECTIVELY, AND FOR SCIENTIFIC OR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY!
Neural Attractor-Network Classification of Visual Field Data
Purpose: Since many neuroophthalmological diseases and lesions may be recognized from perimetric examinations, the appropriate classification of visual field data is essential for diagnosis. However, adequate classification and interpretation of perimetric examination results is not a trivial task and requires well-trained personnel with long-term experience. Therefore, an Internet-based classification system for visual field data derived from perimetric examinations is introduced that may act as a world-wide accessible "counselor" to the diagnosing physician.
Methods: The classification system (see below) is based on a neural Hopfield-attractor-network that consists of N neurons. These neurons are assigned to the N stimulus locations of the stimulus grid that is used to examine the visual field (temporary restriction: only TAP-2000 stimulus grid for a 30°-visual field available). Therefore, the neurons obtain their input data from perimetric examination results being submitted through the Internet (http://www.wfbabcom5.com/wf33.htm). An iterated relaxation process determines the states of the neurons dynamically. Therefore, even "noisy" perimetric output, e. g., early stages of a disease, may eventually be classified correctly according to the predefined idealized scotomata patterns (diseases) stored as attractors of the network. The classification result containing confidence levels for each network-known disease is transmitted via e-mail or through the Internet to the sender almost immediately after data-submission.
Results: Preliminary tests of the classification system on real visual field data derived from perimetric examinations have shown a classification success of over 80%. There is good reason to believe that this success rate might be improved in future versions of the classification system.
Conclusions: An Internet-based classification system for visual field data, like the one proposed here, furnishes a valuable first overview in judging perimetric examination results and gives an indication towards the final diagnosis by a physician. It should not be considered a substitute for the diagnosing physician. However, thanks to the world-wide accessibility of the Internet the classification system offers a promising perspective towards modern computer-assisted diagnosis in medicine.
EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH SYSTEM!
NO RESPONSIBILITY TAKEN FOR THE RESULTS!
Please, type the e-mail address below where the classification result should be sent to:
This page is still under construction!
Copyright © by Dr. Wolfgang Fink
Last modified: Thu 21 Sep 2000 at 12:19 AM